Applicability and scope context
Entity scope, services, sector context and the assumptions behind applicability are made explicit before gaps are rated.
A focused assessment of governance, cybersecurity measures, incident capability, supplier risk and evidence, translated into a prioritised management route.
20 minutes · no obligation · usually a reply within one business day
Report included. Final pricing follows a written scope agreement; complexity and requested depth may affect the project fee. Indicative turnaround: 2–4 working days for a defined scope, subject to timely access to documentation.
The review connects applicability, governance, security measures, supplier dependencies and incident readiness in one management view.
Entity scope, services, sector context and the assumptions behind applicability are made explicit before gaps are rated.
Board accountability, roles, reporting and risk ownership are reviewed alongside operational responsibilities.
Existing security measures are mapped against the relevant NIS2 outcomes to identify material weaknesses and evidence gaps.
Critical suppliers, incident escalation and reporting readiness are reviewed as part of the same control model.
Management receives a prioritised action plan that separates urgent exposure from longer-term maturity work.
The review moves from scope to governance, measures, dependencies and a clear sequence of action.
Confirm the organisational and regulatory context.
Review current governance, measures, ownership and evidence.
Focus on material control gaps and critical dependencies.
Give management a clear implementation and governance agenda.
A good fit when NIS2 applies or is commercially expected and you need a practical baseline rather than another generic checklist.
Discuss your situationBack to NIS2 →The starting assessment is designed to clarify NIS2-related exposure and management priorities, with a documented scope and a report included in the agreed price. It does not replace a formal legal opinion.
One defined organisation or business unit, a focused applicability discussion, review of agreed core records, interviews with selected key roles, governance and cybersecurity measure assessment, and a management summary with a prioritised improvement route.
Assumptions about applicability, board and operational responsibilities, evidence gaps, incident readiness, critical supplier dependencies and the actions that deserve earliest management attention.
Comprehensive legal advice, full implementation, extensive testing of every technical safeguard, multi-entity reviews and broader supplier audits are scoped as separate work where needed.
No. It makes assumptions and open questions explicit. Specialist legal or supervisory guidance may be needed for a binding interpretation.
Yes, for the documented base scope. Timing, complexity and additional locations or systems are considered before the final written offer.
Tell us what you already know about applicability, current controls and supplier dependencies. We will help define the most useful assessment scope.
Discuss your NIS2 Gap Analysis