AI use-case and system inventory view
Known AI systems and use cases are mapped with their purpose, business context, owners and important dependencies.
A practical assessment of AI use, ownership, risk decisions, oversight and lifecycle controls. It shows what needs governance now and what can remain lightweight.
20 minutes · no obligation · usually a reply within one business day
Report included. Final pricing follows a written scope agreement; complexity and requested depth may affect the project fee. Indicative turnaround: 2–4 working days for a defined scope, subject to timely access to documentation.
The assessment makes AI use, ownership, risk decisions and control gaps visible before you add unnecessary process or tooling.
Known AI systems and use cases are mapped with their purpose, business context, owners and important dependencies.
Decision rights are reviewed across business, technology, risk, legal, privacy and security so accountability gaps become visible.
Risk classification, approval, oversight and escalation are assessed against the impact of the AI use cases in scope.
Lifecycle controls are reviewed across acquisition, development, change, monitoring, incidents and retirement.
Management receives a prioritised roadmap that separates immediate governance needs from optional management-system formalisation.
The assessment starts with real use cases, then follows ownership, risk decisions and lifecycle control.
Identify relevant AI use, systems, owners and dependencies.
Review decisions, risk criteria, approvals, monitoring and evidence.
Apply stronger governance where impact and uncertainty are higher.
Decide whether to improve the operating model directly or formalise with ISO 42001.
A good fit when AI use is growing faster than governance, or management wants a baseline before investing in ISO 42001.
Discuss your situationBack to AI Governance →The assessment establishes a first workable picture of AI use, ownership, risk and oversight. It is intended to inform decisions and is not a formal audit of every AI system against all legal requirements.
One defined organisation or business unit, an initial inventory of known AI uses, selected interviews, review of agreed policies or registers, and an indicative governance and risk assessment.
Receive an overview of identified use cases, accountability gaps, significant control questions and a practical set of priorities for management. A management summary and initial implementation route are included.
Full legal classification of every AI system, detailed technical or model testing, exhaustive supplier assurance and ISO 42001 implementation are not automatically included.
No. Creating an initial inventory is part of the assessment, provided relevant people and supplier information are available.
Yes, for the agreed baseline scope. Additional business units, use cases or requested depth may change the written fee and timetable.
Tell us where AI is being used and what is creating pressure. We will help define a focused assessment scope and the decisions it needs to answer.
Discuss your AI Governance Assessment